Skip to main content

Watch: David Miller scores the fastest T20 international hundred

In the second of out feel good series. We look back on David Miller scoring a 35-ball hundred against Bangladesh. A look back on better times.

Big questions ahead the Australia ODI series




Due to the ever expanding international fixture list, it is becoming more and more difficult to squeeze full tours in, so international teams have taken to completing tours in pieces. Not the worst idea, but it does mean we are left with things like seemingly arbitrary one-week tours, over three games, which have no discernible benefit. But, this is the lead up to a World Cup year after all, and with that comes a few questions that need to be answered before the big thing actually happens.

Is Aiden Markram our answer at #4? 

The retirement of AB de Vlliers has created a power vacuum of sorts in the national team. Now shorn of the value of one of the five greatest ODI players of all time as well as unarguably the most destructive, possibly of all time, but most definitely in his era, the team has spluttered along a bit at the death. It must be said,that AB was present for when India completely ran us over at home, 5-1, in the ODIs earlier this year, with only our Pink ODI kit's patented invulnerability saving us from a complete whitewash.
Aiden Markram has been earmarked as a future potential superstar from a young age, and he certainly had the mother of all coming out parties last summer, scoring hundreds for fun in the Tests, including a pair of centuries in the series vs Australia against arguably the best Test bowling attack in the world at the moment (it would be an incorrect argument, but still worth debating). His incredible introduction to Test cricket has unfortunately not been matched in ODI. As it currently stands, young Markram averages 24, and has shown very little skill or industry against spin in ODI,  given the fact that India are amongst the favourites for the World Cup, and they always go in with at least a two -headed spin monster,it would be preferable if Aiden showed a bit of skill against Australia's spinners, who, with respect, will be a bit of a step down. Batting at #4 does include a significant time spent in the middle overs, which are historically very spin-dominant. With the modern game having turned 300 into a par total, it is definitely a cricket truism that one can't just survive in the middle overs, one has to thrive. For this series, though, I'd be happy with Markram just surviving. We also, know nothing about his death hitting, but that's the end of cricket games. No point in wondering if the boy can swim at the deep end if he keeps drowning halfway into the journey. Reeza Hendricks made a century on debut, And AB has gone on record as saying that he'd like to see him be given a run. That puts a lot of pressure on Markram to succeed. Lets hope it makes a diamond in two weeks.

Who will be our second all-rounder?
Andile Phehlukwayo is definitely the incumbent for one of the all rounder spots. Don't be angry about it, he just is. At an average of 27 with the bat, and 33 with the ball, his numbers are just fine for the number 8 all-rounder who is entrusted with hitting a few lusty blows and also bowling some over in the middle and at the death.
The real question, one which one could argue is as much a question of team composition as it is player selection, is one regarding who should be the second all-rounder. Conventional wisdom suggests that it will be either one of Dwaine Pretorius or Chris Morris, but in surprisingly selecting Farhaan Behardien, the selectors have brought another name into the hat. Farhaan definitely isn't the bowler Pretorius or Morris are, but he is a better batsman, or at least has shown more wares internationally, than the two of them. Could he be used as a batting all-rounder at #7, with him and JP trying to bowl 10-15 overs a game? It would certainly be risky from management, especially given the fact that calling Behardien a bowler is basically as far as imagination is willing to stretch, and maybe even too far.. It must be said that it isn't as if Morris and Pretorius have made compelling cases for their inclusions. They certainly haven't made themselves undroppable. They both average in the teens with the bat, and Morris is a rather expansive bowler, especially for someone who doesn't take that many wickets. With Wiaan Mulder back in January, there is a strong possibility that only one of these men will be on the plane to England and Wales.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Watch: Hansie Cronje slaps Shane Warne all around the Wanderers

As one of the greatest cricketers in history, Shane Warne has generally had the upper hand when it came to most battles, but on this fateful day at the Wanderers, it didn't matter what he bowled, he had to fetch it in Row Z.   

Theunis de Bruyn might not be very good

The last time Theunis de Bruyn was in the subcontinent, he scored a fourth innings hundred in Sri Lanka. A fourth innings ton in the subcontinent buys you a lot of time, especially in tours to the sub-continent. The reason is pretty simple, the fourth innings of a game is when the pitch is at it's most decrepit, Asian pitches generally take turn sooner than non-subcontinental pitches, so it does reason that if you score a ton in the fourth innings in Asia, you must by definition be some sort of genius level player of spin.  That is the only reason Theunis de Bruyn is on this tour. We would not be in favour of dropping him after just the one Test, but his dismissal in the first innings, a big booming cover drive against Ravindra Jadeja, with light fading and the day nearly done, was both reckless and unnecessary. Yes, batting is about scoring runs, and as such if balls are in slots which  players identify as their strong zones, they should feel within their rights to have ...

We are keeping Quinton down

Quinton de Kock is good at cricket. Everyone who plays cricket at an international level is good at cricket, but even in that hallowed territory, one can see that Quinton de Kock is exceptionally good at cricket. He boasts no obvious weakness, and there are very few good balls which he can't turn into boundary balls. He also happens to be, both on form and reputation, South Africa's best batsman, especially now that the great Hashim Amla has retired. This presents a quandary of sorts, because while de Kock's prodigious ability to take a game away from the opposition batting at 7 is not in question, the reality is more often than not, he has had to come in and repair some very creaky holes in the ship. In the history of cricket, only one team has ever had their best batsman keep wicket. Andy Flower, the Zimabwean great, was the only man who managed this feat of endurance and focus. You could arguably place AB de Villiers on this shortlist, but he only kept for 23 Tests an...