Skip to main content

Watch: David Miller scores the fastest T20 international hundred

In the second of out feel good series. We look back on David Miller scoring a 35-ball hundred against Bangladesh. A look back on better times.
Post a Comment

Two spin(ners) or not two spinners


When South Africa toured India in 2015, something peculiar happened. It wasn't that we lost 3-0, having gone over a decade undefeated in overseas tours. That was sad, but all good things come to an end. What I am referring to is the fact that we went into the majority of a series with two spinners. This was not just rare, it literally has never happened before. Not even in our previous tours to India.

This may seem instinctively counter-intuitive, but South Africa has had the good fortune of having elite subcontinental fast bowlers in the tank . Shaun Pollock averaged a respectable 27 in India, and 22 in Pakistan. Allan Donald averaged 16 in India, and of course, Dale Steyn's average of 21 in the subcontinent is legendary. Even an accessory talent like Morne Morkel had a respectable enough average of 32 in India. When your guns are that big, there is simply no need to have a second spinner. Especially when your first spinner is Nicky Boje or Paul Harris. Honest, hard working spinners. But when your front line spinners are basically about as potent as the opposition's back up spinner, it serves to reason that your back spinner will probably not be a match-winner. 

Historically, this high pace battery has worked well for South Africa. In the 21st century, South Africa have won one Test series and drawn two others out of five in India. Of the two series they drew, they were leading the series heading into the final Test in both. 

Clearly, the three pace bowler line up and one spinner line up has worked extremely well for the Proteas in India. There are however extenuating circumstances. For one, pitches in India are no longer what they were. This is less a concern than a statement of fact. Where India was once a batting paradise for the technically proficient, it became a battle of survival the last time South Africa was there. Dean Elgar had four wickets before lunch of the first Test, which is as big a sign of a rank turner as is humanly possible. These are the conditions under which  the Proteas will likely play the upcoming India series. We already know Keshav Maharaj is legit business. He took wickets for fun in the last year's series vs Sri Lanka. The question is whether the second spinner, likely Dane Piedt has the wares to bowl well enough to warrant overs as the second spinner.

The other concern is generally, when a team plays two spinners, one of them is generally good enough to bast at 8, and thus lengthen the batting line up. Take India for example, both Jadeja and Ashwin could probably bat 6 at an absolute push. In the Protea line-up, Vernon  Phlander may potentially be a Test seven in a loaded batting line-up, but none of the spinners are capable of batting any higher than nine. 

With all this in mind, would I play two spinners? Yes, but only because I don't think conditions will require more than a second pace bowler.. 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Watch: Hansie Cronje slaps Shane Warne all around the Wanderers

As one of the greatest cricketers in history, Shane Warne has generally had the upper hand when it came to most battles, but on this fateful day at the Wanderers, it didn't matter what he bowled, he had to fetch it in Row Z.   
4 comments
Read more

Theunis de Bruyn might not be very good

The last time Theunis de Bruyn was in the subcontinent, he scored a fourth innings hundred in Sri Lanka. A fourth innings ton in the subcontinent buys you a lot of time, especially in tours to the sub-continent. The reason is pretty simple, the fourth innings of a game is when the pitch is at it's most decrepit, Asian pitches generally take turn sooner than non-subcontinental pitches, so it does reason that if you score a ton in the fourth innings in Asia, you must by definition be some sort of genius level player of spin.  That is the only reason Theunis de Bruyn is on this tour. We would not be in favour of dropping him after just the one Test, but his dismissal in the first innings, a big booming cover drive against Ravindra Jadeja, with light fading and the day nearly done, was both reckless and unnecessary. Yes, batting is about scoring runs, and as such if balls are in slots which  players identify as their strong zones, they should feel within their rights to have ...
2 comments
Read more

We are keeping Quinton down

Quinton de Kock is good at cricket. Everyone who plays cricket at an international level is good at cricket, but even in that hallowed territory, one can see that Quinton de Kock is exceptionally good at cricket. He boasts no obvious weakness, and there are very few good balls which he can't turn into boundary balls. He also happens to be, both on form and reputation, South Africa's best batsman, especially now that the great Hashim Amla has retired. This presents a quandary of sorts, because while de Kock's prodigious ability to take a game away from the opposition batting at 7 is not in question, the reality is more often than not, he has had to come in and repair some very creaky holes in the ship. In the history of cricket, only one team has ever had their best batsman keep wicket. Andy Flower, the Zimabwean great, was the only man who managed this feat of endurance and focus. You could arguably place AB de Villiers on this shortlist, but he only kept for 23 Tests an...
1 comment
Read more